Russell Brand Testifies at London Trial, Citing Lack of Defense Witnesses
The comedian told Southwark Crown Court that no one with relevant evidence agreed to support his defense as he denied seven sexual offense charges.
By Luka Evans ·

Russell Brand testified at Southwark Crown Court on Wednesday that no witness with relevant evidence has agreed to support his defense. The comedian and presenter is currently facing seven charges, including three counts of rape and three counts of sexual assault. He strongly denies all criminal wrongdoing.
The trial began after the prosecution concluded its case. Defense lawyer Ian Winter then presented Brand as the first witness for the defense. The court is examining allegations from six women regarding incidents that occurred between 1999 and 2009. Justice Bennathan reduced the final charge from indecent assault to attempted indecent assault on Tuesday afternoon.
The allegations span a decade. One woman claims Brand raped her in a hotel room in Bournemouth in 1999 following a comedy performance. Another alleges that in 2004, Brand grabbed her breasts and pushed her into a toilet in a Soho bar, where he orally raped her. A third woman states that Brand anally raped her at his home in Hampstead in 2009 after consensual vaginal sex.
During questioning, Winter asked if Brand had been able to persuade anyone to testify. Brand answered, "I have not." He also responded "No" when asked if anyone would touch him with a bargepole. He described his life as being "consumed by these allegations." Brand mentioned that his life changed after marrying U.S. pop star Katy Perry in 2010, a shift he described as "staggering fame."
Brand was also questioned about the 2023 Channel 4 Dispatches documentary that prompted police to begin investigating him. He described that period as "devastating." This documentary was followed by allegations published in The Sunday Times.
Regarding the first complainant, Brand recalled meeting her at the Labour Party conference in Bournemouth in 1999. He found her "loquacious" and "interesting." He denied that she was raped that night, stating, "I know what no means." He said he cared "very much" about her comfort during the encounter.
On the 2004 allegation, Brand said a friend introduced him to the woman. He denied grabbing her breasts, calling the behavior "disgusting." He stated they spoke for less than a minute before going to a bathroom to "fool around." Brand insisted there was "absolutely no question" she consented to entering the cubicle and that his penis did not enter her mouth.
For the 2009 allegation, Brand described the encounter as "memorable." He acknowledged having consensual vaginal sex in his bedroom but denied anally raping the woman. He said she did not tell him to stop. He noted that he believed consent is "fundamental, essential and necessary, and in many ways more important than sex itself."
The trial is scheduled to continue. It may last for up to six weeks. The defense team will continue to present its arguments after Brand's testimony.
Brand’s testimony marked a shift in the proceedings as the first defense witness. He denied all charges while addressing the timeline of the alleged offenses. The jury is now considering his account alongside the prosecution's evidence.
More News · National news · Report a business · Got a Story?





